Guidance Note for Humanitarian Crisis Planning in Iran–Israel War Context

1. Immediate Life-Saving Priorities

Iran:

  • Mobilize emergency health services near likely military targets (e.g., oil refineries, nuclear plants).
  • Strengthen civil defense shelters in urban areas.
  • Scale up food and medicine stockpiles in sanctions-hit areas.
  • Launch psycho-social support for communities facing internal displacement and trauma.

Israel:

  • Expand emergency shelter systems (especially in the North and Central Districts under missile threat).
  • Secure fuel and electricity backups for hospitals.
  • Activate mobile clinics and trauma care for both Israeli and Arab populations.
  • Ensure continuity of care for Gaza-border communities already displaced.

2. Coordination Mechanisms

Israel: Leverage strong coordination between MDA (Magen David Adom), Home Front Command, and UN OCHA observers. Work with civil society groups for Arab-Israeli populations.

Iran: Difficult due to political restrictions. Encourage IRCS (Iranian Red Crescent) to lead coordination and liaise with neutral actors like ICRC and WHO. Use informal coordination platforms with trusted local NGOs.

3. Resource Allocation Strategy

  • Prioritize areas with high civilian density and low mobility (elderly, disabled, displaced).
  • Allocate resources not only by damage but by vulnerability: e.g., host communities, border minorities, refugees.
  • Ensure buffer stocks for 3–6 weeks of active escalation in both countries.

4. Conflict-Sensitive and Neutral Approaches

  • Avoid aligning with state narratives. Aid must be visibly impartial.
  • Support neutral institutions like Red Cross/Crescent and WHO.
  • Public communication must emphasize protection of civilians and international humanitarian law.

5. Gender, Age, and Disability Inclusion

  • Design safe spaces for women and girls in shelters.
  • Ensure hygiene, dignity kits, and maternal care are part of the core NFI packs.
  • Use disaggregated data to identify children, elderly, and persons with disabilities in both nations.
  • Prioritize accessible information and evacuation support for those with mobility issues.

6. Security and Access Risks

Israel: Northern and coastal areas under airstrikes pose risks to aid convoys. Coordination with IDF Civil Authority is essential for NGO movement.

Iran: International staff face visa and movement restrictions. Remote management or partnership with national actors is critical. Potential cyberattacks may disrupt aid logistics.

7. Recommendations for International and National Actors

International Actors:

  • Scale pre-positioned humanitarian supplies via Jordan, Armenia, Turkey, and Gulf states.
  • Increase diplomatic advocacy for humanitarian corridors and ceasefires.
  • Fund locally-led organizations, especially those working in cross-border areas.

National Authorities:

  • Both governments must uphold Geneva Conventions by allowing humanitarian access.
  • Coordinate with UN bodies, ICRC, and national Red Cross/Crescent networks.
  • Ensure transparent and accountable aid distribution to avoid politicization.

 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Ghost in the Machine: Digital Harassment – Pakistan’s New Battleground for Gender Equality

A Realistic Outlook for Humanitarian Funding in Pakistan

Protection Risks and Policy Approaches for Rohingya Refugees in Southeast Asia