The Financial Blind Spots of Humanitarian Life
The Financial Blind Spots of
Humanitarian Life
Tahir
Ali Shah
This article is
adapted and contextualized from ideas originally explored by Anthony Pusatory,
Founder of The Seven Pillars. I have expanded the discussion to reflect the
realities of Pakistani and globally mobile humanitarian professionals.
Most
of us entered humanitarian work because we care deeply about impact. We think
about vulnerable communities, program design, donor compliance, and field
realities. What we rarely think about, at least not seriously, is our own
long-term financial stability. We save when we can. Some of us invest in
property. Some open savings accounts. A few contribute to formal pension
schemes. But very few of us step back and ask a hard question: if my contract
ends tomorrow, or if I reach retirement age, am I genuinely prepared?
Humanitarian
careers are structurally different from stable domestic employment. Contracts
are temporary. Funding cycles are uncertain. We move cities and countries.
Benefits appear generous while they last, and then disappear completely.
Because transitions are normal in our sector, financial gaps quietly accumulate
in the background. They remain invisible until a crisis forces them into view.
The
first blind spot concerns pensions and retirement contributions. Retirement
always feels distant, especially when you are negotiating your next posting or
managing an emergency response. But pension systems are mathematical. They
reward continuous contribution and penalize gaps. In Pakistan, many
private-sector employees are covered under the Employees’ Old-Age Benefits
Institution, commonly known as EOBI. The idea behind EOBI is simple: both
employer and employee contribute during working years so that a monthly pension
becomes available after reaching retirement age, currently set at sixty for men
and fifty-five for women under existing rules. On paper, this provides a safety
net.
In
practice, however, many humanitarian professionals fall into grey areas. Some organizations
register staff under EOBI; others do not. International NGOs sometimes operate
through arrangements where EOBI compliance is unclear. Short-term contracts,
consultancies, and project-based hiring often mean contributions are
inconsistent. Years can pass without proper registration or contribution
tracking. Because the monthly deductions seem small and retirement seems far
away, few people check whether their EOBI contributions are actually being
recorded.
This
is where the danger lies. Pension systems, whether EOBI in Pakistan or social
security systems abroad, depend on consistent contributions over time. Missing
years reduce benefits. In some cases, insufficient contribution years may
affect eligibility altogether. Many professionals assume that because they have
worked for reputable organizations, their pension records must be in order.
That assumption needs verification. It is important to confirm whether your
employer is registered with EOBI, whether your contributions are being
deposited, and how many contribution years are recorded in your name.
For
those who have worked internationally, the situation becomes more complicated.
Time spent abroad often means no contribution to the Pakistani pension systems
at all. When you return home after ten or fifteen years overseas, you may
discover that your official pension record shows only a handful of contributing
years. At that stage, rebuilding the required years becomes difficult. The
earlier you check, the more options you have. The later you check, the fewer
choices remain.
The
second blind spot involves taxes, international income, and retirement savings.
Humanitarian professionals frequently work across jurisdictions. Some earn in
dollars, others in euros or local currencies. Some pay income tax locally;
others operate under tax-exempt arrangements depending on the host country and
contract structure. These complexities create room for misunderstanding.
For
example, Pakistani professionals working abroad may assume that because they
are paying tax in another country, their long-term retirement structure is
secure. In reality, paying tax somewhere does not automatically build pension
rights in Pakistan. Conversely, if income is structured in a way that minimizes
taxation, retirement contribution opportunities may also be reduced. The
principle is consistent across systems: tax incentives and pension benefits are
usually connected to taxable income. When income falls outside a national tax
base, associated retirement benefits often disappear as well.
Many
professionals choose arrangements that reduce their immediate tax burden. That
is a natural instinct. If you can legally reduce taxes today, it feels like a
smart decision. But without long-term comparison, it is incomplete thinking.
Saving money today while weakening retirement accumulation tomorrow may not be
optimal. The correct choice depends on income level, family situation,
retirement plans, and future country of residence. The problem is not choosing
one strategy over another; the problem is choosing without running the numbers.
This
is particularly relevant for those who oscillate between Pakistan and overseas
assignments. You may spend five years abroad, then return for two years under a
local contract, then leave again. Each transition affects pension
contributions, tax status, and savings structure. Without deliberate tracking,
the overall picture becomes fragmented. A fragmented career often produces a
fragmented retirement.
The
third blind spot concerns what I call the “freedom fund.” Traditional financial
advice recommends saving three to six months of expenses as an emergency fund.
That advice works for someone in stable employment with predictable benefits.
It is rarely sufficient for humanitarian professionals.
Consider
how compensation packages in our sector are structured. Your contract may
include housing, health insurance, education allowance for children, transport,
and hardship allowances. These benefits become normal. You stop thinking about
them because they are automatically provided. But the moment your contract
ends, they vanish. If you calculate your emergency savings based only on your
take-home salary, you are underestimating your real exposure.
Imagine
earning the equivalent of six thousand dollars per month, while your organization
also covers accommodation worth two thousand dollars, health insurance, and
schooling support. If the contract ends, your actual monthly cost does not
remain six thousand; it may jump to ten or twelve thousand when you must pay
everything independently. A six-month fund based only on salary might look
comfortable on paper, but it could evaporate quickly once real expenses
surface.
For
Pakistani professionals returning home after international assignments,
additional transition costs arise. There may be relocation expenses, temporary
housing, children’s school admissions, furniture purchases, vehicle
arrangements, and medical coverage gaps. These are not rare events; they are
common during career transitions. Yet most people do not budget for them because
they are easier to ignore while income is steady.
A
more realistic approach for humanitarian professionals is to maintain six to
twelve months of true living expenses, not just salary-based calculations. This
fund should be liquid and stable. It should not depend on stock market
performance. Emergency savings are meant to buy time and preserve dignity
during transitions. They provide the freedom to reject unsuitable offers and
wait for the right opportunity instead of accepting the first available contract
out of financial pressure.
Underlying
all three blind spots is a cultural issue within our sector. We are comfortable
discussing budgets for communities but uncomfortable discussing personal
finances. There is an unspoken belief that focusing on our own financial
security appears selfish. In reality, it is responsible. Financial fragility
makes professionals vulnerable. It increases the likelihood of burnout, poor
decisions, and ethical compromise. Stability, on the other hand, strengthens
independence and integrity.
In
Pakistan, where formal social safety nets are limited and family systems are
often expected to fill gaps, the need for personal financial planning is even
greater. EOBI pensions are modest and may not sustain a middle-class lifestyle independently.
Relying solely on future family support is uncertain. Property investments may
help, but they are illiquid and subject to market fluctuations. Diversified
savings, documented pension contributions, and deliberate retirement planning
are not luxuries; they are necessities.
The
core message is not fear. It is awareness. Pension gaps can be addressed if
identified early. Tax strategies can be reviewed and optimized. Emergency funds
can be gradually built. None of these actions require extraordinary financial
expertise. They require attention and honesty.
If
you work in the humanitarian sector from Pakistan or abroad, take three
practical steps. Verify your EOBI registration and contribution history if you
are employed locally. Review how your international contracts affect your
pension and tax position. Calculate your true monthly burn rate, including
benefits you currently receive from your employer. These exercises may feel
uncomfortable, but they transform uncertainty into clarity.
I
began this article thinking I would share guidance. I end it recognizing that
financial literacy in humanitarian life is not a one-time lesson. It is an
ongoing responsibility. Our careers are built on service, mobility, and
adaptation. Our financial systems, however, are rigid and rule-based. Bridging
that gap requires deliberate effort.
Serving
others sustainably requires that we ourselves remain stable. Financial
awareness does not reduce our commitment to humanitarian values; it strengthens
our ability to uphold them over the long term.
The author has worked for more than three decades in humanitarian and development contexts across conflict and crisis-affected settings, with experience in senior leadership, program management, and advisory roles. tshaha@gmail.com
Comments